Talk:Part Loft Technical Details: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "I was not able to reverse engineer the interpolation used in the Loft. Here's what I've compared it to: B-spline interpolations (see http://www.cad.zju.edu.cn/home/zhx/GM/009/...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Also tried one of the bulgiest and simplest of interpolations I know:<br> |
Also tried one of the bulgiest and simplest of interpolations I know:<br> |
||
r(t)=sum(i=0 to n-1) of (<br> |
r(t)=sum(i=0 to n-1) of (<br> |
||
point[i] |
point[i]*product(j=0 to n-1 except j) of (t-i)<br> |
||
)<br> |
)<br> |
||
But the loft is even bulgier than this. |
But the loft is even bulgier than this. |
||
Revision as of 22:43, 22 November 2014
I was not able to reverse engineer the interpolation used in the Loft. Here's what I've compared it to: B-spline interpolations (see http://www.cad.zju.edu.cn/home/zhx/GM/009/00-bsia.pdf): knot method=uniform knot method=chord length knot method=centripetal (power=1/2) knot method=universal The Loft surface is seriously more "bulgy" than the bulgiest B-spline.
Also tried one of the bulgiest and simplest of interpolations I know:
r(t)=sum(i=0 to n-1) of (
point[i]*product(j=0 to n-1 except j) of (t-i)
)
But the loft is even bulgier than this.
DeepSOIC (talk) 19:59, 22 November 2014 (CET)